nyquistfrequency Refutation on Set theory

[StudentDriver]

My philosophy explains set theory. The statements in my philosophy start with the word "I"

in response to: "But there must be something simultaneous which conditions the process, that which governs the process' becoming, the purpose or telos of the process if you will. For otherwise there would be nothing which would condition the next term in the sequence."

- that's me. I condition the next term in the sequence.