City Tutoring Discussion Forum

Sorry about replying so late I was kind of exhausted at the time.


The Father alone is not the seed, His Son is too, but the Father is self-progenating, and therefore becomes the Father only through His Son. How can one become a parent without having offspring?


The Monad (the Son) is not ...

You have no clue as to the reason for WHY these fundamental properties you listed are valid


Yes I do? All the properties I listed are either basically definitionally true (like substitution) or derivable from their definitions (commutativity, distributivity etc.). I don't view mathematics as ...

I dont think I agree with the premise that using algebra or computational reduction to solve for variables is fundamentally different or even uninteresting compared to some abstract notion of the "essence of an expression", and as a matter of fact I think algebra takes the notion of the "essence ...

How does your mental model of essence and substance translate to tetration or higher compositions ("simultaneities") of addition, multiplication, et cetera?

Also your LaTeX as above, if I have formatted properly, is:

https://laas.vercel.app/api/svg?white=true&input=x%2Bx%20%3D%20x%20%5Ccdot%20x ...

You are way too verbose, you don't need this much verbiage to prove anything. You have taken Greek Geometry and only complicated it with repetitive legalism, and jargon, also children are not going to understand what you wrote there.

Also you just use ChatGPT to write and validate all this. Here's ...

I wanted to upload a PDF document but realized that I can't, even though it's within file size limitations, however I can compress it and upload it for whatever reason.

Aight, How tf does addition equal multiplication. Because 100*5=500 and 100+5=105. There is a literal big difference between addition and multiplication.


It's quite clear that you did not properly read or understand what I wrote.
I did not say addition and multiplication are the same, I was ...

Stupid question deserves Stupid answer: 2+2=2*2 bc both equals 4.


Yay, you have successively discovered WHAT they equal but NOT WHY they are equal.
You have grasped THAT they arrive at the same destination but NOT WHY they do and what this says about the deeper nature of the number 2.
It's ...

One of my favorite topics of thought is the mystery of the Trinity. The question of the order of procession of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit has remained unanswered. Having given this conundrum much consideration, I continuously find new ways of understanding both the Eastern Orthodox and Roman ...

You are doing too much work, you could have just simply said in a single sentence:
A set of all sets refutes itself through regress as there could be no "first set" which contains all other sets, as that first set, being a set by definition must be contained by "a set of all sets".